DNSSEC adoption

Two different things, both worth knowing: whether a TLD is signed in the root, and how many of its registered domains are signed.

Signed new gTLDs
1,110
of 1,114 (99.6%)
Unsigned
4
no DS record in the root
Second-level signing
1,083
TLDs with zone data
A TLD being signed in the root says the registry supports DNSSEC. It says nothing about uptake: a signed TLD can have almost no signed registrations. The second column below is the one that measures actual adoption, and it needs zone data.

Largest new gTLDs and their signing status

TLD Domains Root signed Signed domainsRate
.sbi 110 ✔ Yes 105
95.45%
.セール 107 ✔ Yes 1
0.93%
.tui 106 ✔ Yes 4
3.77%
.pfizer 105 ✔ Yes 1
0.95%
.protection 102 ✔ Yes 1
0.98%
.discover 101 ✔ Yes 1
0.99%
.cern 100 ✔ Yes 1
1%
.dhl 96 ✔ Yes 66
68.75%
.saxo 96 ✔ Yes 1
1.04%
.chase 95 ✔ Yes 1
1.05%
.kfh 94 ✔ Yes 2
2.13%
.teva 94 ✔ Yes 1
1.06%
.microsoft 89 ✔ Yes 15
16.85%
.komatsu 87 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.deloitte 86 ✔ Yes 55
63.95%
.azure 85 ✔ Yes 1
1.18%
.cba 84 ✔ Yes 1
1.19%
.ifm 81 ✔ Yes 1
1.23%
.reit 81 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.mini 79 ✔ Yes 1
1.27%
.toray 79 ✔ Yes 72
91.14%
.bloomberg 78 ✔ Yes 1
1.28%
.संगठन 78 ✔ Yes 3
3.85%
.apple 75 ✔ Yes 1
1.33%
.pru 75 ✔ Yes 1
1.33%
.موقع 75 ✔ Yes 2
2.67%
.jpmorgan 74 ✔ Yes 2
2.7%
.canon 73 ✔ Yes 2
2.74%
.bridgestone 71 ✔ Yes 1
1.41%
.axa 70 ✔ Yes 1
1.43%
.クラウド 70 ✔ Yes 3
4.29%
.家電 68 ✔ Yes 1
1.47%
.招聘 66 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.prudential 65 ✔ Yes 1
1.54%
.monash 64 ✔ Yes 1
1.56%
.sncf 64 ✔ Yes 1
1.56%
.fage 62 ✔ Yes 1
1.61%
.philips 61 ✔ Yes 2
3.28%
.uol 56 ✔ Yes 1
1.79%
.ricoh 55 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.itau 54 ✔ Yes 1
1.85%
.marriott 54 ✔ Yes 1
1.85%
.ابوظبي 54 ✔ Yes 1
1.85%
.mlb 52 ✔ Yes 1
1.92%
.aig 51 ✔ Yes 1
1.96%
.meet 51 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.trust 51 ✔ Yes 13
25.49%
.mango 50 ✔ Yes 1
2%
.shell 50 ✔ Yes 33
66%
.smart 50 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.aquarelle 49 ✔ Yes 1
2.04%
.firmdale 49 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.airbus 48 ✔ Yes 1
2.08%
.eat 47 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.vana 46 ✔ Yes 13
28.26%
.食品 45 ✔ Yes 1
2.22%
.fresenius 44 ✔ Yes 1
2.27%
.anz 43 ✔ Yes 4
9.3%
.case 43 ✔ Yes 1
2.33%
.itv 43 ✔ Yes 2
4.65%
.pictet 43 ✔ Yes 1
2.33%
.vig 43 ✔ Yes 1
2.33%
.ファッション 43 ✔ Yes 1
2.33%
.bauhaus 41 ✔ Yes 1
2.44%
.cisco 41 ✔ Yes 19
46.34%
.alibaba 40 ✔ Yes 3
7.5%
.here 40 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.sandvik 40 ✔ Yes 1
2.5%
.statebank 40 ✔ Yes 39
97.5%
.statefarm 40 ✔ Yes 1
2.5%
.八卦 39 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.abbvie 38 ✔ Yes 1
2.63%
.bostik 38 ✔ Yes 2
5.26%
.ipiranga 38 ✔ Yes 1
2.63%
.jio 36 ✔ Yes 1
2.78%
.abb 35 ✔ Yes 1
2.86%
.schmidt 35 ✔ Yes 1
2.86%
.書籍 35 ✔ Yes 1
2.86%
.ismaili 34 ✔ Yes 1
2.94%
.scb 34 ✔ Yes 22
64.71%
.sener 34 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.clubmed 33 ✔ Yes 1
3.03%
.fly 32 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.hisamitsu 32 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.sap 32 ✔ Yes 3
9.38%
.kpn 31 ✔ Yes 27
87.1%
.schaeffler 31 ✔ Yes 1
3.23%
.jprs 30 ✔ Yes 19
63.33%
.walter 30 ✔ Yes 1
3.33%
.dot 29 ✔ Yes 2
6.9%
.ikano 29 ✔ Yes 1
3.45%
.nhk 29 ✔ Yes 25
86.21%
.sandvikcoromant 29 ✔ Yes 1
3.45%
.barclaycard 28 ✔ Yes 6
21.43%
.latrobe 27 ✔ Yes 1
3.7%
.pioneer 26 ✔ Yes 1
3.85%
.sew 26 ✔ Yes 1
3.85%
.بيتك 26 ✔ Yes 1
3.85%
.youtube 26 ✔ Yes 1
3.85%
.ally 25 ✔ Yes 1
4%

Data currency. Domain counts on this page are from zone files dated and refresh daily. Registrar figures are from ICANN's monthly registry reports for May 2026, which ICANN publishes about three months in arrears; zone files contain no registrar information, so no fresher source exists. Full detail on methodology and live pipeline status.