DNSSEC adoption

Two different things, both worth knowing: whether a TLD is signed in the root, and how many of its registered domains are signed.

Signed new gTLDs
1,108
of 1,112 (99.6%)
Unsigned
4
no DS record in the root
Second-level signing
1,083
TLDs with zone data
A TLD being signed in the root says the registry supports DNSSEC. It says nothing about uptake: a signed TLD can have almost no signed registrations. The second column below is the one that measures actual adoption, and it needs zone data.

Largest new gTLDs and their signing status

TLD Domains Root signed Signed domainsRate
.auspost 116 ✔ Yes 1
0.86%
.yandex 116 ✔ Yes 1
0.86%
.erni 114 ✔ Yes 3
2.63%
.セール 107 ✔ Yes 1
0.93%
.tui 106 ✔ Yes 4
3.77%
.eat 103 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.protection 103 ✔ Yes 1
0.97%
.cern 102 ✔ Yes 1
0.98%
.discover 101 ✔ Yes 1
0.99%
.chase 97 ✔ Yes 1
1.03%
.saxo 97 ✔ Yes 1
1.03%
.dhl 96 ✔ Yes 66
68.75%
.kfh 94 ✔ Yes 2
2.13%
.teva 94 ✔ Yes 1
1.06%
.microsoft 89 ✔ Yes 15
16.85%
.komatsu 88 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.deloitte 86 ✔ Yes 55
63.95%
.azure 85 ✔ Yes 1
1.18%
.cba 84 ✔ Yes 1
1.19%
.here 83 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.संगठन 83 ✔ Yes 3
3.61%
.ifm 82 ✔ Yes 1
1.22%
.sbi 80 ✔ Yes 78
97.5%
.toray 80 ✔ Yes 71
88.75%
.mini 79 ✔ Yes 1
1.27%
.bloomberg 78 ✔ Yes 1
1.28%
.apple 76 ✔ Yes 1
1.32%
.pru 75 ✔ Yes 1
1.33%
.reit 75 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.canon 74 ✔ Yes 2
2.7%
.jpmorgan 74 ✔ Yes 2
2.7%
.bridgestone 73 ✔ Yes 1
1.37%
.موقع 71 ✔ Yes 2
2.82%
.axa 70 ✔ Yes 1
1.43%
.クラウド 70 ✔ Yes 3
4.29%
.家電 68 ✔ Yes 1
1.47%
.fly 67 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.招聘 66 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.prudential 65 ✔ Yes 1
1.54%
.monash 64 ✔ Yes 1
1.56%
.sncf 64 ✔ Yes 1
1.56%
.fage 62 ✔ Yes 1
1.61%
.philips 62 ✔ Yes 2
3.23%
.ricoh 56 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.uol 56 ✔ Yes 1
1.79%
.ابوظبي 56 ✔ Yes 1
1.79%
.itau 55 ✔ Yes 1
1.82%
.marriott 55 ✔ Yes 1
1.82%
.shell 55 ✔ Yes 36
65.45%
.phone 53 ✔ Yes 1
1.89%
.meet 52 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.mlb 52 ✔ Yes 1
1.92%
.aig 51 ✔ Yes 1
1.96%
.mango 51 ✔ Yes 1
1.96%
.trust 51 ✔ Yes 13
25.49%
.smart 50 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.alibaba 49 ✔ Yes 3
6.12%
.aquarelle 49 ✔ Yes 1
2.04%
.firmdale 49 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.書籍 49 ✔ Yes 1
2.04%
.airbus 48 ✔ Yes 1
2.08%
.dot 48 ✔ Yes 2
4.17%
.vana 47 ✔ Yes 13
27.66%
.vig 47 ✔ Yes 1
2.13%
.anz 45 ✔ Yes 4
8.89%
.食品 45 ✔ Yes 1
2.22%
.cisco 44 ✔ Yes 19
43.18%
.fresenius 44 ✔ Yes 1
2.27%
.ファッション 44 ✔ Yes 1
2.27%
.itv 43 ✔ Yes 2
4.65%
.pictet 43 ✔ Yes 1
2.33%
.case 42 ✔ Yes 1
2.38%
.bauhaus 41 ✔ Yes 1
2.44%
.sandvik 40 ✔ Yes 1
2.5%
.statebank 40 ✔ Yes 39
97.5%
.statefarm 40 ✔ Yes 1
2.5%
.八卦 39 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.abbvie 38 ✔ Yes 1
2.63%
.bostik 38 ✔ Yes 2
5.26%
.ipiranga 38 ✔ Yes 1
2.63%
.jio 36 ✔ Yes 1
2.78%
.abb 35 ✔ Yes 1
2.86%
.schmidt 35 ✔ Yes 1
2.86%
.clubmed 34 ✔ Yes 1
2.94%
.ismaili 34 ✔ Yes 1
2.94%
.scb 34 ✔ Yes 21
61.76%
.sener 34 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.hisamitsu 32 ✔ Yes 0
0%
.kpn 32 ✔ Yes 25
78.13%
.sap 32 ✔ Yes 3
9.38%
.schaeffler 32 ✔ Yes 1
3.13%
.jprs 30 ✔ Yes 19
63.33%
.walter 30 ✔ Yes 1
3.33%
.ikano 29 ✔ Yes 1
3.45%
.nhk 29 ✔ Yes 25
86.21%
.sandvikcoromant 29 ✔ Yes 1
3.45%
.barclaycard 28 ✔ Yes 6
21.43%
.latrobe 27 ✔ Yes 1
3.7%
.pioneer 26 ✔ Yes 1
3.85%
.sew 26 ✔ Yes 1
3.85%

Data currency. Domain counts on this page are from zone files dated and refresh daily. Registrar figures are from ICANN's monthly registry reports for July 2026, which ICANN publishes about three months in arrears; zone files contain no registrar information, so no fresher source exists. Full detail on methodology and live pipeline status.